BIENVENIDO A ESTE BLOG, QUIENQUIERA QUE SEAS



jueves, 10 de junio de 2021

Consideraciones sobre la temida modificación del Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum (Monseñor Viganò)

 CHIESA E POST CONCILIO


TRADUCIDO DEL ITALIANO POR EL TRADUCTOR DE GOOGLE

Con motivo del Simposio de Filosofía dedicado a la memoria de Mons.Antonio Livi, que se celebró en Venecia el pasado 30 de mayo ( aquí ), traté de identificar los elementos que se repiten constantemente a lo largo de la historia en la obra de engaño del Maligno. En ese examen mío ( aquí ) me había centrado en el fraude pandémico, mostrando cómo las razones dadas para justificar las medidas coercitivas ilegítimas y las limitaciones no menos ilegítimas de las libertades naturales eran en realidad profecías , es decir, motivaciones aparentes destinadas a ocultar una intención intencional y maliciosa, un diseño criminal. La publicación de los correos electrónicos de Anthony Fauci ( aquí ) y la imposibilidad de censurar las cada vez más numerosas voces disidentes con respecto a la narrativa mainstream han confirmado mi análisis y nos dejan la esperanza de una flagrante derrota de los defensores del Gran Reinicio.

En ese discurso me detuve, si lo recuerdan, en el hecho de que incluso el Concilio Vaticano II fue en cierto modo un Gran Restablecimiento para el cuerpo eclesial, como otros acontecimientos históricos planeados y diseñados para revolucionar el cuerpo social. Incluso en ese caso, de hecho, las excusas esgrimidas para legitimar la reforma litúrgica, el ecumenismo y la parlamentarización de la autoridad de los Santos Pastores no se basaron en la buena fe, sino en el engaño y la mentira, para hacernos creer que el bien seguro al que renunciamos - la Misa apostólica, la singularidad de la Iglesia para la salvación, la inmutabilidad del Magisterio y la Autoridad de la Jerarquía - podría ser justificado por un bien superior. Lo cual, como sabemos, no solo no sucedió (ni pudo suceder), sino que se manifestó en todo su valor subversivo disruptivo: las iglesias están vacías, los seminarios desiertos, los conventos abandonados, la autoridad desacreditada y pervertida en tiranía en beneficio de los malos Pastores o ineficaz para los buenos. Y también sabemos el propósito de este Restablecimiento; esta devastadora revolución fue desde el principio inicua y obstinada, aunque envuelta en nobles intenciones de convencer a los fieles y al clero de que obedecieran.

En 2007, Benedicto XVI reconoció el pleno derecho de la ciudadanía a la venerable liturgia tridentina, devolviéndole esa legitimidad que le había sido negada durante cincuenta años a través de abusos. En su Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum declaró:
Por tanto, está permitido celebrar el Sacrificio de la Misa según la edición típica del Misal Romano promulgado por el Beato Juan XXIII en 1962 y nunca abrogado, como forma extraordinaria de la Liturgia de la Iglesia. […] Para esta celebración según uno u otro Misal, el sacerdote no necesita ningún permiso, ni de la Sede Apostólica, ni de su Ordinario ( aquí ).
En realidad, la carta del Motu Proprio y de los documentos de ejecución nunca se aplicaron plenamente y los cœtus fidelium que hoy celebran en el rito apostólico continúan pidiendo permiso a su Obispo, aplicando esencialmente los dictados del Indulto del Motu Proprio anterior, Ecclesia Dei, de Juan Pablo II. El justo honor en el que debe celebrarse la liturgia tradicional fue moderado por su equiparación con la liturgia de la reforma posconciliar, por la definición de esa forma extraordinaria y esta forma ordinaria, como si la Esposa del Cordero pudiera tener dos voces, una plenamente católica y otra equívocamente ecuménica, con las que dirigirse ahora a la divina Majestad, ahora a la asamblea de los fieles. Pero tampoco cabe duda de que la liberalización de la Misa Tridentina hizo bastante bien, nutriendo la espiritualidad de millones de personas y acercando a la Fe a muchas almas que, en la esterilidad del rito reformado, no encontraron incentivo ni para la conversión ni para la menos aún para el crecimiento interior.

El año pasado, con el comportamiento típico de los Novatori, la Santa Sede envió un cuestionario a las diócesis del Orbe en el que pedían información sobre la aplicación del Motu Proprio de Benedicto XVI: la formulación misma de las preguntas traicionaba otra vez, un segundo propósito; y las respuestas que se enviaron a Roma debían crear la base de una aparente legitimidad para llevar a una limitación del Motu Proprio, si no a su total abrogación. Ciertamente, si el autor de Summorum Pontificum todavía se sentaba en el Trono, ese cuestionario habría permitido al Pontífice recordar a los obispos que ningún sacerdote debe pedir permiso para celebrar la Misa en el rito antiguo, ni ser retirado del ministerio por ello. Pero la intención real de quienes quisieron consultar los Ordinarios no parece residir en la salus animarum, sino en el odio teológico de un rito que expresa con claridad adamantina la fe inmutable de la Santa Iglesia, y que por ello es ajena. a la ecclesiología conciliar, a su liturgia y a la doctrina que presupone y transmite. No hay nada más opuesto al llamado Magisterio del Vaticano II que la liturgia tridentina: cada oración, cada pasaje - como dirían los liturgistas - constituye una afrenta a los delicados oídos de los novatori, toda ceremonia es una ofensa a sus ojos.

Simplemente tolerar que haya católicos que quieran beber de las fuentes sagradas de ese rito les suena a una derrota, soportable sólo si se limita a pequeños grupos de ancianos nostálgicos o estetas excéntricas. Pero si la forma extraordinaria -que lo es en el sentido común del término- se convierte en la normalidad para miles de familias, jóvenes, gente corriente consciente de su elección, se transforma en piedra de escándalo y hay que oponerse, limitarla, abolirla sin tregua; ya que no debe haber oposición a la liturgia reformada, ninguna alternativa a la miseria de los ritos conciliares, así como frente a la narrativa dominante no puede haber voz de disensión o refutación argumentada del globalismo; o ante los efectos secundarios de una vacuna experimental no es posible adoptar tratamientos efectivos que demuestren su inutilidad.

Tampoco nos puede sorprender: quien no viene de Dios, es intolerante con todo lo que recuerde, aunque sea remotamente, una época en la que la Iglesia católica estaba gobernada por pastores católicos, y no por pastores infieles que abusan de su autoridad; un tiempo en que la Fe fue predicada en su integridad a la gente, y no adulterada para agradar al mundo; una época en la que los hambrientos y sedientos de la Verdad fueron alimentados y apagados por una liturgia terrena en forma pero divina en sustancia. Y si todo lo que hasta ayer fue santo y bueno hoy es condenado y ridiculizado; permitir que quede algún rastro de ella hoy es inadmisible y constituye una afrenta intolerable. Porque la Misa Tridentina toca hilos del alma que el rito montiniano ni siquiera se atreve a tocar.

Evidentemente, los que maniobran detrás del Vaticano para eliminar la misa católica son los que en el Motu Proprio ven comprometida la obra de décadas, amenazan la posesión de tantas almas que hoy se mantienen subyugadas, y debilitan su tiranía sobre el cuerpo eclesial. Los mismos sacerdotes y obispos que, como yo, han redescubierto ese inestimable tesoro de la fe y la espiritualidad, o que por la gracia de Dios nunca lo han abandonado, a pesar de la feroz persecución del período postconciliar, no están dispuestos a renunciar a él, habiendo encontraron el alma de su sacerdocio y el alimento de su vida sobrenatural. Y es inquietante, además de escandaloso, que ante el bien que aporta la Misa tridentina a la Iglesia haya quienes quieran prohibirla o limitar su celebración, sobre la base de motivos engañosos.

Sin embargo, si nos ponemos en la piel de los Novatori, entendemos cuán perfectamente consistente es esto con su visión distorsionada de la Iglesia, que no es una sociedad perfecta instituida jerárquicamente por Dios para la salvación de las almas, sino una sociedad humana en la que una autoridad corrupta esclaviza a la élite que favorece y de hecho dirige las necesidades de vaga espiritualidad de la misa, negando el propósito para el que Nuestro Señor lo quiso; y en el que los Buenos Pastores se ven obligados a la inacción por los grilletes burocráticos a los que son los únicos que deben obedecer. 

Este impasse, este callejón sin salida legal, significa que el abuso de autoridad puede imponerse a los sujetos precisamente en virtud del hecho de que reconocen en él la voz de Cristo, incluso ante la evidencia de la maldad intrínseca de las órdenes dadas, de los motivos que lo determinan y de los mismos sujetos que lo ejercen. Por otro lado, incluso en el ámbito civil, durante la pandemia, muchos obedecieron normas absurdas y nocivas porque les fueron impuestas por médicos, virólogos y políticos que debían preocuparse por la salud y el bienestar de los ciudadanos; y muchos no querían creer, incluso frente a la evidencia del diseño criminal, que podían desear positivamente la muerte o la enfermedad de millones de personas. Es lo que los psicólogos sociales llaman disonancia cognitiva, que induce a los individuos a refugiarse en un cómodo nicho de irracionalidad en lugar de reconocerse víctimas de un engaño colosal y, por tanto, tener que reaccionar con valentía.

Por tanto, no nos preguntemos por qué, ante la multiplicación de comunidades vinculadas a la liturgia antigua, el florecimiento de las vocaciones casi exclusivamente en el contexto del Motu Proprio, el aumento de la frecuencia de los sacramentos y la coherencia de los cristianos, la vida de quienes la siguen, estos "pastores",  quieran pisotear, lamentablemente, derecho inalienable y obstaculizar la Misa apostólica: la pregunta es errónea y la respuesta engañosa.

Más bien, preguntémonos por qué herejes conocidos y fornicadores no éticos deberían tolerar que sus errores y su deplorable conducta de vida sean desafiados por una minoría de clérigos fieles y desprotegidos cuando tienen el poder para prevenirlo. Llegados a este punto, entendemos bien que esta aversión no puede dejar de hacerse explícita de forma precisa y única para acabar con el Motu Proprio, abusando de una autoridad usurpada y pervertida

Incluso en la época de la pseudorreforma protestante, la tolerancia hacia algunas costumbres litúrgicas arraigadas en el pueblo duró poco, porque esas devociones a la Virgen María, esos himnos en latín, esas campanas que suenan en la Elevación, eran la expresión de una Fe que los seguidores de Lutero habían negado. Novus y Vetus Ordo , así como la Misa Católica y la Cena Luterana, son incompatibles ontológicamente.  

En una inspección más cercana, la derrota de Vetus defendida por los partidarios del Novus es al menos consistente con sus principios, exactamente como debería ser la derrota del Novus por parte de Vetus . Por tanto, quienes creen que es posible unir dos formas opuestas de culto católico se equivocan, en nombre de una pluralidad de expresión litúrgica que es hija de la mentalidad conciliar, ni más ni menos que la hermenéutica de la continuidad .

El modus operandi de los Novatori emerge una vez más en esta operación contra el Motu Proprio: primero algunos de los más fanáticos opositores a la liturgia tradicional lanzan como provocación de la abrogación del Summorum Pontificum definir la Misa antigua como "divisiva"; entonces la Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe pide a los Ordinarios que respondan un cuestionario (aquí), cuyas respuestas están prácticamente empaquetadas (la carrera del Obispo depende de la forma en que apoyará lo que informará a la Santa Sede, por el contenido del cuestionario también será de conocimiento de la Congregación de Obispos); luego, casualmente, durante una reunión a puerta cerrada con los miembros del Episcopado italiano, Bergoglio dijo que le preocupaban los seminaristas "que parecían buenos, pero rígidos" ( aquí ) y la difusión de la liturgia tradicional, reiterando siempre que la reforma litúrgica conciliar es irreversible; de nuevo, nombra Prefecto del Culto Divino a un acérrimo enemigo del Vetus Ordo, que constituye un aliado en la aplicación de cualquier restricción. 

Finalmente, nos enteramos de que los cardenales Parolin y Ouellet están entre los primeros en querer este recorte del Motu Proprio ( aquí ): esto obviamente lleva a los prelados "conservadores" a apresurarse a defender el actual régimen de convivencia de las dos formas ordinarias y extraordinarias , dando a Francisco la oportunidad de mostrarse como un moderador prudente de las dos corrientes opuestas y conduciendo "sólo" a una limitación del Summorum Pontificum más que a su abrogación total. Lo cual, como sabemos, era exactamente lo que había estado buscando desde el inicio de la operación.

Independientemente del resultado final, el deus ex machina de esta previsible obra es y sigue siendo Bergoglio, dispuesto tanto a atribuirse el mérito de un gesto de indulgencia indulgente hacia los conservadores como a descargar las responsabilidades de una aplicación restrictiva sobre el nuevo prefecto, Mons. . Arthur Roche y sus compañeros. 

Así, ante una protesta coral de los fieles y una reacción desplazada del Prefecto u otros Prelados, se volverá a disfrutar del enfrentamiento entre progresistas y tradicionalistas, contando entonces con excelentes argumentos para afirmar que la convivencia de las dos formas de El rito romano conlleva divisiones en la Iglesia y que, por tanto, es más prudente volver a la pax montiniana , es decir, a la proscripción total de la misa habitual.

Insto a mis hermanos en el episcopado, sacerdotes y laicos, a defender enérgicamente su derecho a la liturgia católica, sancionado solemnemente por la Bula Quo primum.de San Pio V; y defender con ella a la Santa Iglesia y al Papado, ambos expuestos al descrédito y al ridículo de los mismos Pastores. 

La cuestión del Motu Proprio no es negociable en lo más mínimo, porque reafirma la legitimidad de un rito que nunca se abroga ni se deroga. Además, al cierto daño que traerán a las almas estas venturosas innovaciones y a la cierta ventaja que de ello derivará para el Diablo y sus sirvientes, hay que sumar la indecente rudeza a Benedicto XVI, todavía vivo, por parte de Bergoglio,  quién debe saber que la autoridad que el Romano Pontífice ejerce sobre la Iglesia es vicaria, y que el poder que tiene proviene de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo, la única Cabeza del Cuerpo Místico: abusar de la Autoridad Apostólica y del poder de las Santas Llaves con un propósito opuesto al para el cual fueron instituidas por el Señor representa una ofensa sin precedentes a la Majestad de Dios, una deshonra para la Iglesia y una culpa por la cual tendrá que dar respuesta a Aquel de quien es Vicario. Y quien rechaza el título de Vicario de Cristo, sepa que con él también falla la legitimidad de su autoridad.

No es aceptable que la autoridad suprema de la Iglesia se permita cancelar, en una operación perturbadora, la cultura en clave religiosa, la herencia que ha recibido de sus Padres; ni es lícito considerar fuera de la Iglesia a quienes no están dispuestos a aceptar la privación de la Misa y de los sacramentos celebrados en la forma que ha forjado casi dos mil años de santos

La Iglesia no es una empresa donde el departamento de marketing decide cancelar productos antiguos del catálogo y proponer nuevos, de acuerdo con las solicitudes de los clientes. Ya ha sido doloroso imponer con fuerza la revolución litúrgica a sacerdotes y fieles, en nombre de la obediencia al Concilio, arrebatándoles el alma misma de la vida cristiana y sustituyéndola por un rito que el masón Bugnini copió del Libro del Común Oración de Cranmer. Ese abuso, parcialmente remediado por Benedicto XVI con el Motu Proprio, no puede repetirse de ninguna manera ahora, en presencia de elementos que están todos en gran parte a favor de la liberalización de la liturgia antigua. Si uno realmente quisiera ayudar al pueblo de Dios en esta crisis, debería abolir la liturgia reformada que, en cincuenta años, ha causado más daño que el calvinismo.

No sabemos si las temidas restricciones que la Santa Sede pretende imponer al Motu Proprio afectarán a los sacerdotes diocesanos o si afectarán también a los Institutos, cuyos miembros celebran exclusivamente el rito antiguo. Sin embargo, me temo, como ya he dicho en el pasado, que será precisamente sobre este último donde se desencadene la acción de demolición de los Novatori, que tal vez puedan tolerar los aspectos ceremoniales de la liturgia tridentina, pero no aceptan en absoluto la adhesión a la estructura doctrinal y eclesiológica que implica, y que contrasta claramente con las desviaciones conciliares que quieren imponer sin derogación. 

Por eso es de temer que a estos Institutos se les pida alguna forma de sumisión a la liturgia conciliar, por ejemplo haciendo obligatoria la celebración del Novus Ordo al menos ocasionalmente , como ya deben hacer los sacerdotes diocesanos. De esta manera, quienes hagan uso del Motu Proprio se verán obligados no solo a una aceptación implícita de la liturgia reformada, sino también a una aceptación pública del nuevo rito y sus mensajes doctrinales. Y quien celebre las dos formas del rito se verá ipso facto desacreditado sobre todo en su coherencia, pasando sus elecciones litúrgicas como un hecho puramente estético, diría casi coreográfico y privándolo de todo juicio crítico hacia la Misa Montiniana y al mensaje que le da forma: porque se verá obligado a celebrar esa Misa. Una operación maliciosa y astuta, esta, en la que una autoridad que abusa de su poder deslegitima a quienes se le oponen, por un lado concediéndoles el rito antiguo, pero por el otro haciéndolo una cuestión puramente estética y forzando un biespiritismo insidioso y una adhesión aún más insidiosa a dos enfoques doctrinales opuestos y contrastantes. 

Pero, ¿cómo se le puede pedir a un sacerdote que celebre ahora un rito venerable y sagrado en el que encuentra perfecta coherencia entre doctrina, ceremonia y vida, y ahora un rito falsificado que hace un guiño a los herejes y calla vilmente lo que el otro proclama con orgullo?

Oremos, por tanto: oremos para que la Divina Majestad, a quien rendimos culto perfecto celebrando el venerable rito apostólico, se digne a iluminar a los Sagrados Pastores para que desistan de su propósito, y de hecho aumente la Misa Tridentina para el bien de la Santa Iglesia y para la gloria de la Santísima Trinidad. 

Invocamos a los Santos Patronos de la Misa: San Gregorio Magno, San Pío V y San Pío X en primer lugar; y todos los santos que a lo largo de los siglos han celebrado el Santo Sacrificio en la forma que nos ha sido transmitida para que lo guardemos fielmente. Que su intercesión ante el trono de Dios no impida la conservación de la Misa de todos los tiempos, gracias a la cual podemos santificarnos, fortalecernos en las virtudes y resistir los ataques del Maligno. 

Y si alguna vez los pecados de los hombres de la Iglesia merecieran un castigo tan severo como el profetizado por Daniel, preparémonos para descender a las catacumbas, ofreciendo esta prueba por la conversión de los pastores.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, arzobispo
9 de junio de 2021
Feria IV infra Hebdomadam II
post Octavam Pentecostes

martes, 1 de junio de 2021

La agenda 2030 - Dr. Miklos Lukacs

 SURSUM CORDA


Duración 29:30 minutos

https://youtu.be/0nG8QU6pLiA

Homenaje al Dr Mariano Arriaga desde España

 DRA NATALIA PREGO CANCELO

Duración 2:53 minutos

https://rumble.com/vhu2rl-homenaje-al-dr-mariano-arriaga-desde-espaa.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DRA+NATALIA+PREGO+CANCELO&ep=2

New from Archbishop Viganò: The Great Reset from start to finish

With the pandemic, little by little they told us that isolation, lockdowns, masks, curfews, 'live-streamed Masses,' distance-learning, 'smartworking,' recovery funds, vaccines, and 'green passes' would permit us to come out of the emergency, and, believing in this lie, we renounced the rights and lifestyles that they warned us would never return: 'Nothing will be the same again.'

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video 

May 31, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – This first Festival of Philosophy [1] is dedicated to Msgr. Antonio Livi, of whom we all preserve a heartfelt and grateful memory, both for his witness of faith as well for his rare erudition in the theological disciplines. The learned Roman prelate is united to me in a particular way by his path of “conversion” to Tradition, which led him, a few years before me, to the assiduous celebration of the venerable Apostolic Liturgy, in perfect coherence with the doctrine in which he was extremely well-versed. Both of us found ourselves rediscovering the treasures of the Mass of our Ordination, with the consolation of also rediscovering our Priesthood in its fullness. If we wish to remember Monsignor Livi worthily today, I think that we cannot neglect the School of “Common Sense” of which he was the initiator, and that in this moment represents an opportunity to deepen our understanding of the present reality: the great upheavals of this past year, the so-called pandemic, and, more generally, the crisis in which both the world and the Church find themselves. The lack of “common sense” in individuals has in large part made possible this assault against God, against the Church, and against the human race that is represented by the Great Reset and the ideology it expresses. Irrationality, the abdication of reason, the annihilation of critical judgment and the denial of evidence are the true pandemic virus of our time, which in rebellion against God manifests a delirium of omnipotence and in collective madness reveals the just nemesis of this wicked challenge. Saint Paul exhorts us to a rational faith, rationabile obsequium (Rom 12;1), in which faith and reason, like two wings, make us ascend to the contemplation of the Truth, that is, of God Himself. Thus, the Apostle’s warning also implies a healthy distance from the thinking of the world: nolite conformari huic sæculo (Rom 12:2).

A significant precedent

When Stalin decided in 1932 to eliminate millions of Ukrainians in the genocide of Holodomor, he planned a famine as an instrument of social engineering, through which to nationalize agricultural lands and then allocate the profits to industry. Stalin wrote:

In order to eliminate the Kulaks as a class, the policy of limiting and eliminating single groups of Kulaks is not enough... it is necessary to break the resistance of this class with an open battle and to deprive it of the economic sources of its existence and development. (Josef Stalin, Questioni di leninismo, Rome, 1945).

Stalin then had wheat, beets, potatoes, vegetables, and every sort of food seized; he forbade any sort of commerce – does this sound familiar? – and confiscated the financial resources of the Ukrainians. Children fleeing the countryside were arrested and deported to collective farms called “kolkhozes” and to orphanages, where they died from malnutrition. The Central Committee prohibited movement – a sort of lockdown ante litteram – and accused those who denounced the massacre of the Ukrainians of being the enemy of the people. Holodomor deniers – using the term in its proper sense – maintain that the genocide of 1932-1933 in the Soviet Ukraine never happened or that it occurred without premeditation. The regime’s censorship contributed to hiding a tragedy that today is recognized by many countries as a crime against humanity and that, upon analysis of its method and goal, was also an example of a “Great Reset.”

If a Ukrainian had wondered how it could be that the Russian government, faced with a famine, did not help the population by sending food but rather forbade commercial activity and movement, thereby aggravating the situation, he would have committed the same error as many today who, in the presence of an alleged pandemic, ask why governments have preemptively undermined public health, weakened national pandemic plans, forbidden effective treatments, and administered harmful if not deadly treatments and are now forcing citizens – using the blackmail of perpetual lockdowns, stay-at-home orders, and unconstitutional “green passes” – to submit to vaccines that not only do not guarantee any immunity but actually carry serious short-term and long-term side effects, as well as further spreading more resistant forms of the virus.

Changing our point of view

Looking for any sort of logic in what is told us by the mainstream media, by our government leaders, by virologists and so-called “experts” is an arduous challenge that disappears as if by magic and turns into the most cynical rationality if we only have the intellectual honesty to overturn our point of view. We should therefore renounce the comforting premise which tells us that our leaders act for our good, and more generally the idea that our interlocutors are honest, sincere, and animated by good principles. 

Believe me, I understand that it would be easier to bask in the illusion that “everything will be fine” and that this pandemic really is a huge disaster that none of us were prepared for. It is much easier to think that the leaders of the world ought to be judged with grateful indulgence, forgiving them for mistakes that anyone in the same position could have made in the fight against the “invisible enemy.” It warms the heart to believe that the multinational pharmaceutical companies and international health agencies have nothing at heart but our good, and that they could never distribute, solely for economic calculation, experimental drugs that will end up making us all chronically ill or will exterminate us. And it is incredibly difficult and psychologically exhausting to face the daily domestic struggle we have to endure with relatives and friends, acquaintances and colleagues at work, simply because we consider the COVID narrative absurd. Being considered “conspiracy theorists” or “deniers” and being made the object of pity, contempt, or social condemnation is a thankless fate, especially when the people who believe in the global lie are dear to us. And it is even more thankless to feel discriminated against and ostracized even from our ecclesial community, all the more so when we see the ideological flattening in conformity with the mainstream narrative on the part of the bishops and the highest levels of the Hierarchy.

The reality is quite different, and not wanting to accept it makes us fall into that cognitive dissonance that social psychology has extensively studied. The reality is not only different but diametrically opposed to what we are being told, and it will be better for us if we want to understand it, recognize it, face it, and fight it with all our strength – also because the modus operandi with which similar cases have been carried out in the course of history is substantially the same.

Let’s put ourselves in the shoes of the proponents of the Great Reset

Let’s start from the point of view of those who organized this plot rather than of those who are suffering it unknowingly. If we put ourselves in the shoes of a Bill Gates, a George Soros, or a Klaus Schwab, it will not be difficult to understand that if we shamelessly declare that we have decided to decimate the world population by means of a gene serum, in all probability we will not obtain the consent of the masses nor the support of institutions, because making our criminal plan known would provoke a revolt and above all it would reveal our cards.

In reality, we have even declared our plans on several occasions; we have written them in the proceedings of our congresses; we have reiterated them in interviews and institutional meetings; we have even had them engraved on the Georgia Guidestones. Perhaps our admission of this criminal design sounded too brazen, and those who may have felt threatened preferred to look elsewhere, blaming instead those who raised the alarm, unheeded like Laocoon.[2]

And so we decide to tell the “beautiful fable” of global commitment, of eco-sustainability, of inclusivity, of resilience in the face of a virus that we ourselves probably created in a laboratory in Wuhan financed by us, presenting it as a deadly pandemic that requires immediate measures to be taken that are justified by the health emergency. And since there could not really be an emergency since it is simply a flu syndrome, an almost normal coronavirus just as happens in any other year, we have to ask the officials of the WHO – an entity financed almost completely by us and by our ally the Chinese communist dictatorship – to give directives prohibiting treatment, creating a high number of deaths attributable to COVID, and leading patients to death by imposing forced ventilation on them. Obviously the pharmaceutical companies, of which we are shareholders through the Black Rock investment fund, have every interest in producing vaccines without the usual experimentation period, because at the same time that treatments are prohibited, the laws protecting public health can also be waived, and the vaccines – or rather, the gene serums – can be authorized for experimental distribution. And to seal the pactum sceleris with the Chinese regime, we can snow it under with orders for masks, swabs tests, ventilators, and medical supplies, even though we know that they are useless and do not comply with health parameters. In the meantime, our “experts” – who are almost always former employees or whose institutes and consultancies we sponsor – sow panic in the media with projections and forecasts as absurd as they are terrifying, while journalists and television hosts prostitute themselves to their new boss, renouncing professional ethics and their duty to respect the truth at all costs. But we know well that money and fame can easily purchase the sycophantic collaboration and complicit silence of many, especially if they owe their positions to us, if we are shareholders of the newspapers they work for or the main buyers of their advertising space. At the same time, we ensure that public funds are allocated to fund the media, obviously with the implicit expectation that they will promote the official narrative and censor every dissenting voice. 

Healthcare is also in our hands, and for years now! We have progressively destroyed the public healthcare system, making use of our personnel in national governments, in the European Union, and in international organizations; and after destroying it we lamented its inefficiency and recommended that it be replaced with private healthcare, of which we are shareholders. What remains of public health is nevertheless set up on a business model that places profit before the provision of services, and in any case it is always the State that pays off the debts of healthcare companies. We know well that the profits to be made off the pandemic are quite tempting to many, even to the point of remaining silent in the face of hospitalizations that are useless or that will even lead to the death of the patient as a result of the treatments that we have mentioned instead of giving them home care. Three thousand euros per day for an intensive care bed for a COVID patient thus legitimizes the social alarm, because those beds are few – we have had their number reduced in recent years thanks to complacent politicians – and in order to increase them during a full pandemic emergency the State spends exorbitant amounts without going through a process of taking bids. If we then manage to use swab tests to make people believe that a very high percentage of the population is positive for the virus, we will guarantee the persistence of the state of emergency, and with it the lockdown and containment measures that destroy the economy. And this is exactly what we want: to cancel small businesses, forcing the population to purchase online everything they can no longer buy in the local family-run store, making money even off the pizza parlor or the restaurant that in order to survive is forced to use delivery companies of which we made sure we were shareholders. Finally, in order to make this assault complete, we increase illegal immigration thanks to our “humanitarian” foundations and NGOs, thereby increasing crime, diverting funds from citizens that are earmarked instead towards dealing with immigration costs, and making Europe be invaded by waves of Muslims who demand rights. Their presence allows us to inexorably break up the social and religious fabric of nations, in the name of “welcoming” and leveraging the sense of guilt, the danger of racism and the do-good rhetoric that we have even succeeded in getting the Catholic Church to accept. Obviously the social destabilization we have created allows us to promulgate laws against discrimination and racial hatred, repressing the dissent of those who feel invaded and threatened. Finally, thanks to the State debt due to the pandemic and the social emergency we have artificially created, we are able to impose the disbursement of funds from the International Monetary Fund, the Central European Bank, and the European Union, putting the population into the noose of debt and constraining it to invest those funds according to criteria and “conditionalities” that only serve to make the transformation of society, the technological community, and the “green economy” even more irreversible: this is the Great Reset. 

First we succeeded in creating fear of an “invisible enemy” and silencing the dissenting voices of scientists, intellectuals, and simple citizens; then we succeeded in making people believe that the salvation of the world depends on vaccines; now we are able to blackmail billions of human beings, who will be told that if they want to return to some form of loosening of the restrictions that have been imposed they must accept the “green pass” in order to travel abroad, go to the stadium or go shopping. The pressure we have placed on the masses is such that many will accept these forms of control. Soon they will put out their hands to have a subcutaneous chip implanted that will permit us to bring our plan to its completion.

All this is now a reality: both the vaccine passport, which will not necessarily be limited to COVID, as well as electronic payments in place of cash. “No one could buy or sell unless he had the mark” (Rev 13:17). Thus it will only take pressing a button to cancel a person from social life – and we will be the ones who press it. 

And as an insult against the civilization we hate, we force the masses to feed on beetles and larvae, extolling their nutritional properties and their low environmental impact, while we reserve choice meats for ourselves. We ask them to renounce private property in exchange for universal income, with which they can pay us the leasing for their 30-square-meter housing unit, obviously with zero emissions. We send them around on electric scooters made in China while we ride in custom-built cars that cause all sorts of pollution, cruise around on very expensive yachts and travel by helicopter. And while laid-off fifty year olds get jobs as delivery boys, we receive billions in dividends from our companies based in tax havens. We have reached such a level of enslavement of the masses that we have no reason to fear any revolt, which in any case would be quelled with truncheon blows as the media and our ally the Left remained silent. 

Even if the pandemic farce does not have the desired effects due to unforeseen events, we already have the next step ready: the climate emergency as the pretext for imposing the “ecological transition” and “sustainable development.” Or else we will start yet another conflict in the Middle East so as to provoke terrorist attacks in our cities and sow panic among the population. And if these tried and tested methods don’t succeed, we could invent – why not? – an alien attack, about which some of our friends are beginning to open the famous Overton Window: what better than extra-terrestrials can be considered an “invisible enemy” to feed collective fear, after decades of films in which we show invasions of creatures from outer space? On the other hand, the masses believe everything the mainstream media tells them – as we have seen in recent months – no matter how absurd and irrational it may be. If you see it on television, it must be true!

The modus operandi of the Great Reset

And now, taking off the shoes of Gates and Soros, we observe the entire operation from the outside, seeking to identify the recurring elements. The first, as I said earlier, is the secrecy of the criminal design of the elite and the need to cloak it in acceptable ideals. The second is the creation of an emergency situation – in the past it could have been a war fought with weapons, today a bacteriological war or a conflict fought financially – that makes recourse to the solutions that the elite has prepared and planned inevitable. The third element consists in the apparent solution that allows for the implementation of those “reforms” and limitations of personal liberties that in normal times would be unacceptable and illegitimate. This will split society internally, creating new enemies of the people and distracting them from the real architects of the conflict. 

If we think about the attack of September 11, 2001, we understand that the modus operandi is essentially the same, as also happened with the Gulf War or the Libyan Civil War. The terrorist threat was used as prophasis, an apparent cause, a false pretext for authorizing investments in the military industry, the tightening of controls on the populace, political upheavals, and to appropriate energy resources in Iraq and Libya and prevent the economic independence of the nations of the former French colonies in West and Central Africa. The destabilization thus achieved fueled the ethnic substitution plan in Europe and at the same time stripped Africa of the young generations that would have been able to make it prosperous and autonomous. It also struck the Catholic communities in the former colonies by fueling Islamic fanaticism as a prerequisite for bloody conflicts and now exports those conflicts to a de-Christianized Europe that inertly watches the daily burning of its churches, while a petulant Swedish girl is used by the system as an apocalyptic preacher of climate change and global warming. 

At the base of this modus operandi there is always a lie, that serves to hide the true intentions of the elite and makes us accept as inevitable those changes that, in conditions of relative normality, would have resulted in revolts that were difficult to stifle. The blaming of dissenters, the criminalization of those who do not accept subjecting themselves to the vaccine, the psychiatrization of “deniers” or “conspiracy theorists” are taking shape in recent months with the formation of detention camps, the prohibition of travelling without health checks and above all thanks to the pounding drum of the media. The spread of 5G technology, which in many countries has gone unnoticed due to the lockdowns, will allow population tracking by means of apps or a subcutaneous chip in constant connection with the internet.

The Great Reset has numerous precedents

The lie, therefore, is the consistent mark of the architects of the various Great Resets of the last few centuries. The Protestant Pseudo-Reformation was a Great Reset, which struck at Europe’s unity of faith, creating a laceration whose disastrous consequences are still seen today. The French Revolution was a Great Reset, as was the Italian Risorgimento, as well as the Russian Revolution. The two World Wars were Great Resets, along with the Industrial Revolution, the Revolution of 1968, and the fall of the Berlin Wall. Each time, if you notice, the apparent reason for these revolutions never corresponded to the real one. The selling of indulgences as a pretext for Luther’s revolt leveraged the desire of the German Princes to take possession of the monasteries and dioceses and had to obtain the spread of heresy in the world and the weakening of the Papacy, the first defense of Christianity. In France, the poverty of the people was a pretext for the cancellation of the monarchy and the establishment of the Masonic and anti-Christian Republic. The division of the Italian States and the aspiration to an ideal of national unity was the pretext for the destruction of kingdoms and duchies and the annexation of the Papal States to the Kingdom of Italy, whose monarchy was subservient to the Masonic lodges and in its turn was cancelled by them as soon as the task was completed. The oppression of the Russian peasants was the pretext for the elimination of the Czar and the establishment of the communist dictatorship. The claim of individual nationalities was the pretext for the First World War in order to cancel the Austro-Hungarian Empire and perpetuate ethnic conflicts. In the Second World War, Nazism – first financed and then combatted – was a pretext for colonizing Europe and subjecting it economically and culturally to American liberal capitalism and Russian communism, thereby weakening it. The condition of laborers was the pretext for exploiting them in the factories and feeding the Moloch of modern capitalism. Young people’s desire for freedom was the pretext for corrupting their intellect and will, for breaking up the traditional family with divorce, cancelling motherhood with contraceptives and abortion, and striking at the very concept of authority. The end of the Soviet Bloc and its satellite countries was the pretext for spreading liberal capitalism and consumerism and morally corrupting a people exhausted by seventy years of communist dictatorship, whose strenuous opposition to the New World Order is the reason for the recent and continuous attacks on President Putin.

The Great Reset also involves the Church

In this long series of Great Resets organized by the same elite of conspirators, not even the Catholic Church has managed to escape. She too, with Vatican II, saw a greater understanding of the liturgy by the people given as a pretext for destroying the apostolic Mass, cancelling the sacred language and profaning the rites. And the longing for unity with heretics and schismatics was the pretext by which conciliar ecumenism was inaugurated, which laid the ideological foundations for the present apostasy. The democratization of the Church, in the name of an alleged greater participation of the laity, has served only as a pretext for progressively undermining papal power and parliamentarizing the power of the bishops, who are today reduced to mere executors of the decisions of the Bishops’ Conferences. 

The lies of the various Great Resets

Like all frauds, those that are hatched by the devil and his servants are based on false promises that will never be kept, in exchange for which we give up a certain good that will never be restored to us. In Eden, the prospect of becoming like gods led to the loss of friendship with God and to exclusion from eternal salvation, which only the redemptive Sacrifice of Our Lord was able to repair. The revolution against the Catholic monarchies was obtained by the promise made to the lower classes, which was never kept, offering them prosperity and a reduction of taxes. Those who believed in the deception saw their world collapse and found themselves much more oppressed than before. The Industrial Revolution was accepted because it promised new jobs in the factories, but those who left the countryside or the family shop found themselves exploited on the assembly line, torn from the traditional rhythms of the village and crammed together in the bleak outskirts of the large metropolises.

With the pandemic, little by little they told us that isolation, lockdowns, masks, curfews, “live-streamed Masses,” distance-learning, “smartworking,” recovery funds, vaccines, and “green passes” would permit us to come out of the emergency, and, believing in this lie, we renounced the rights and lifestyles that they warned us would never return: “Nothing will be the same again.” The “new normal” will still be presented to us as a concession that will require us to accept the deprivation of freedoms that we had taken for granted, and accordingly we will compromise without understanding the absurdity of our compliance and the obscenity of the demands of those who command us, giving us orders so absurd that they truly require a total abdication of reason and dignity. At each step there is a new turn of the screw and a further step towards the abyss: if we do not stop ourselves in this race towards collective suicide we will never go back.

The lie, therefore. A lie that we also find denounced in Sacred Scripture: if the Serpent had said to Adam and Eve that by eating the fruit of the tree they would lose immortal life and all of the gifts that God had given them, we would still be in Eden. But what can we expect from the one who is “a murderer from the beginning,” “a liar and the father of lies” (Jn 8:44). Was it not thanks to lies and false testimony that Our Lord was condemned, accused by the Sanhedrin of having told people not to pay taxes to Caesar? Was it not with deception and blackmail that the High Priests pushed Pilate to have the Son of God crucified, threatening Pilate that if he found Him innocent he would set himself against the Roman Emperor?

The Great Reset is the last step before the New World Order

It is our duty to reveal the deception of this Great Reset, because it may be traced back to all the other assaults that in the course of history have tried to nullify the work of redemption and establish the tyranny of the Antichrist. Because this is in reality what the architects of the Great Reset intend. The New World Order – a name which significantly echoes the conciliar Novus Ordo – overturns the divine cosmos in order to spread infernal chaos, in which everything that civilization has painstakingly constructed over the course of millennia under the inspiration of grace is overturned and perverted, corrupted and cancelled. 

Each of us must understand that what is happening is not the fruit of an unfortunate sequence of chance occurrences, but corresponds rather to a diabolical plan – in the sense that the Evil One is behind all this – which over the centuries pursues a single goal: destroying the work of creation, nullifying the redemption, and cancelling every trace of good on the earth. And in order to obtain this, the final step is the establishment of a synarchy in which command is seized by a few faceless tyrants who thirst for power, who are given over to the worship of death and sin and to the hatred of life, virtue and beauty because in them shines forth the greatness of that God against whom they still cry out their infernal “Non serviam.” The members of this accursed sect are not only Bill Gates, George Soros, or Klaus Schwab, but also those who for centuries have been plotting in the shadows in order to overthrow the Kingdom of Christ: the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Warburgs, and those who today have formed an alliance with the highest levels of the Church, using the moral authority of the Pope and bishops to convince the faithful to get vaccinated. 

The corruption of authority is the necessary premise of the Great Reset

Along with an awareness of the criminal lie of the entire system, we must also take note of the corruption of authority and the failure of the social, political and religious model that is the child of the Revolution. Modern democracy has proven to be, once again, a deception with which it was desired to oust Christ the King from His lordship over individuals and over societies, under the apparent pretext of giving the people a power that has in fact been usurped by an anti-Christian and antichristic elite. When it is stated that authority does not derive from God but resides in the people; when religion is not considered as a supernatural transcendent principle but instead as an amorphous immanent sentimentalism or a variant of anthropology; when morality loses its bond with the eternal law inscribed by God in human nature and instead adapts to fashions, nothing prevents those who govern as well as the governed from being dishonest and simply pursuing their own particular interests, because there is no longer good and evil, reward and punishment, heaven and hell. Everything is then based on a perverted concept of liberty corrupted into license: one can betray, steal, kill, and lie without hesitation, without that fear of God that in other times was able to curb our inclination to evil: if not out of love for the Creator and Redeemer than at least out of fear of the punishment that our evil conduct would inexorably entail.

We find ourselves facing a political class without ideals, in whom the bonum commune was first replaced by political programs which they used to obtain consent, and today by the simple subservience of those who govern us to the interests who get them elected, pay them, and demand their absolute obedience to the demands of the New World Order. We have reached the point at which even the vote, which was once exalted as the highest expression of democracy, is considered an annoying tinsel, to be granted only if those in charge are certain that they can bend it in their favor, and where it is expressed otherwise it can be modified or ignored: the colossal electoral fraud of the American presidential elections is a striking example of this.

But if the politicians and world leaders are subservient to the globalist elite and do not pursue the good of the citizens, the social contract fails, and the authority with which they believe they are endowed is lost, since it has no ratification, either from above – since the supernatural principle and bond of authority have been cancelled – or from below. And this is nothing but infamous dictatorship and hateful tyranny – a tyranny that cannot be overthrown by appealing to the revolutionary principles that determined it, but by returning to recognize that “there is no authority except from God” (Rom 13:1), and that the “secularism” of the State is a blasphemy, since it denies the sovereign rights of the Creator and Redeemer over those whom He has created and redeemed. 

A crisis of authority that also involves the Hierarchy

That authority which, since the French Revolution, was usurped from the Lord and attributed to the popular will, had remained intact within the Church to some extent. Up until sixty years ago she proclaimed the Kingship of Christ not only over His subjects, over societies and nations, but principally over berself, recognizing Our Lord as the Head of the Mystical Body and the Pope as His Vicar on earth. Vatican II shifted the Kingship of Christ in an eschatological key, and the Church thus found herself a victim of that same democratic deception into which civil societies had fallen almost two centuries earlier. By weakening the doctrine on sin, making the morality of each situation unique, and recognizing the legitimacy of error and false religions, the Catholic Church dethroned herself with her own hands, reducing herself to having to beg for approval and legitimization from the powerful of this world, to whose orders she has submitted. It is no coincidence that Bergoglio has archived the title “Vicar of Christ” as being a thing of the past: if the Church is replaced by an NGO that preaches “green theology”, promotes the Inclusive Capitalism of the Rothschilds and organizes conferences on vaccines with Anthony Fauci, whoever presides over her does not exercise authority in the name of Christ but ends up being a puppet accomplice in the hands of the puppeteer:

He who, on earth, usurps my place, 

my place, my place, 

which in the presence of the Son of God is vacant, 

of my burial-ground hath made a sewer 

of blood and stench; whereby the Pervert, 

who fell from hence, is there below appeased.

(Paradiso XXVII, lines 22 and ff.)[3] 

In this crisis of authority – which involves both temporal and spiritual power – a great responsibility must be attributed to the so-called moderates, who appear to be the voluntary or involuntary fifth column within the social body. Among these we must include almost all of the representatives of the parliamentary oppositions in the various nations – the Italian opposition first of all – and the parties of the so-called center-right. Even those who criticize the illegitimate and unconstitutional rules enacted by the present governments under the pretext of the pandemic do not in the least question the ideological bases of free-market capitalism that today has merged with communism in an alliance that would have been inconceivable in other times. And they do not question these bases because they agree with them.

The error of the ‘moderates

The same mistake of deploring the effects without recognizing and fighting the causes is made by conservative Catholics, who while understanding the apostasy of the highest levels of the Hierarchy under the reign of Bergoglio, do not dare to admit that if it has reached the point of offering idolatrous worship to the Pachamama, this has been made possible thanks to Dignitatis Humanae, that the sabbath of Astana is the coherent application of Nostra Aetate, and that the German Synodal Path – that is, the declaration of schism without its official condemnation by the Holy See – is the logical conclusion of Gaudium et Spes. And there is no need to demonstrate that the conciliar documents are nothing more than the translation of revolutionary and Masonic principles into the ecclesial context. 

We know, however, that the lie is the emblem of the Devil, the distinctive sign of his servants, the hallmark of the enemies of God and the Church. God is truth; the Word of God is true, and He Himself is God. Speaking the truth, shouting it from the rooftops, and unveiling the deception is a sacred work, and no Catholic – nor anyone who has still preserved a shred of decency and honor – may shrink from this duty.

The response of the good

Each of us has been desired, thought of, and created in order to give glory to God and to be part of a great design of providence. From all eternity the Lord has called us to share with Him in the work of redemption, to cooperate in the salvation of souls and the triumph of the good. Each of us today has the possibility of choosing to align himself with Christ or against Christ, to fight for the cause of good or to make himself an accomplice of the workers of iniquity. The victory of God is most certain, as certain as the reward that awaits those who make the choice to enter the battlefield alongside the King of kings; and the defeat of those who serve the enemy is also certain, as is their eternal damnation.

Do you want to lose the supreme good that has been prepared for you, only for the sake of a quiet life and not to stand out from the crowd, out of cowardice and human respect, trading eternity for an apparent and ephemeral good? I exhort you to be witnesses of Christ, courageous champions of truth and goodness: on the benches of parliament, in hospital wards, from the chairs of schools and universities, from the altar and the pulpit, at work, in the office, in the shop, in the family, in your daily commitments and, yes, even in pains and trials. Be worthy heirs of the saints who have preceded you, remembering that you will have to answer for your silence, your complicity, and your cooperation with evil. If you can escape the condemnation of men, you will not be able to escape the judgment of God; just as you will be rewarded for the good you have done and witnessed to.

This rebellious and apostate generation can be fought with everyone’s contribution: from the doctor who finally denounces the harmful treatments imposed by criminal protocols, to the policeman who refuses to apply illegitimate rules; from the parliamentarian who votes against unfair laws, to the magistrate who opens a file for crimes against humanity; from the professor who teaches students to think for themselves, to the journalist who reveals the deceptions and conflicts of interest of the powerful; from the father who defends his children against vaccination, to the son who protects his elderly parent without abandoning him in a nursing home; from the citizen who claims the right to natural freedoms, to the artisan and restaurateur who do not accept the oppression of those who prevent them from opening their business; from the grandfather who warns his grandchildren about the dangers of the dictatorship, to the youth who does not allow himself to be seduced by fashions and influencers.

Let us restore the Crown to Christ the King that was torn from him by the Revolution

And when this farce has collapsed – because it will inexorably collapse, and it will collapse soon – commit yourselves everyone, with renewed zeal, so that the crown that His enemies have torn from Him may be restored to our king. Make Our Lord reign in your souls, in your families, in your communities, in the nation, in work, in education, in the laws and courts, in the arts, in information, in all areas of private and public life. May our most holy mother and queen, Mary Most Holy, who many times has admonished us about the dangers and punishments that await the world if it does not convert and do penance and may Jesus Christ reign in the holy Church, driving out the unworthy, the fornicators and the mercenaries. 

Only where Christ reigns is there true peace and concord: pax Christi in regno Christi. To Him, the beginning and end of all things, the Alpha and the Omega, may the confident and fervent prayer arise from each one of us and from the human family, asking Him to preserve us in His grace, strengthen us in virtue, and make us courageous witnesses of the Gospel so that we may thus achieve eternal beatitude in Heaven.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

30 May 2021

In Festo Ss.mæ Trinitatis

Endnotes

[1] http://www.accademianuovaitalia.it/index.php/home/comunicati-stampa/10145-evento-di-venezia-2021

[2] Laocoon, the priest of Apollo, warned the Trojans to “beware of Greeks bearing gifts” when they wanted to accept the Trojan horse. 

[3] In Dante’s Paradiso, these words are spoken by Saint Peter in condemnation of Boniface VIII. 

sábado, 29 de mayo de 2021

Actualidad Comentada | Los enemigos del Papado | P. Santiago Martín | 28-05-2021

 MAGNIFICAT TV - FRANCISCANOS DE MARÍA

Duración 9:03 minutos

https://youtu.be/V_1W2W6gjEs


TOLKIEN: Sobre los Cuentos de HADAS

EL DEBATE DE HOY

 


Duración 6:37 minutos

https://youtu.be/KNLOdGOy2Lo


La inquisición Resiliente

 EL DIESTRO


El gobierno social comunista con el apoyo de los nacionalistas ha aprobado un plan para la España 2050. Dicho plan en realidad, es un retardo de los objetivos de la Agenda 2030. Cosa que me congratula, es pensar que serán incapaces de llevar a cabo sus planes para el 2030. Asunto, que se entiende por su incompetencia demostrada para llevar a cabo cualquier plan, incluido estos objetivos perversos para la España actual.

Lo primero que llama la atención, es que una persona como Pablo Iglesias; comunista “fetén”. Que jamás negó de las ideas totalitarias del comunismo. Ideales políticos responsables de más de cien millones de personas muertas en el mundo. Que utiliza la democracia para servirse de ella, destruirla y abrazar un nuevo régimen totalitario y comunista, como puede ser el venezolano. Haya sido el presidente de la Agenda 2030 hasta hace poco.

Este plan para la España 2050, repite una serie de palabras que forman ya parte del nuevo léxico político que pretenden inculcarnos los “progres” españoles. Pero que no son suyos, sino que han asimilado de “la progresiva internacional”. Estas palabras, que forman el nuevo catecismo progre son:

1.- Verde. Todo es verde. Refiriéndose al respeto y conservación de la naturaleza. Para conservar la naturaleza en España; han creado una serie de impuestos como: los plásticos, incrementos de la factura de la luz, diesel, quieren poner otro a los billetes de avión, pondrán otro a las autovías, tasa turística, etc). Todas ellas, para preservar el medio ambiente. Cuando en realidad es detraer dinero de los españoles que sí que crean riqueza (sean trabajadores y/o empresarios), para esa legión de nuevos pesebres creados a la llamada de lo Verde. Pongo un ejemplo: Abengoa. Una empresa dedicada a la ingeniería y energía renovables. Habiendo recibido más de 1000 millones de €, con una deuda pública de más de cuatrocientos millones de €. Actualmente se encuentra en administración concursal. Alguien me puede decir dónde ha ido semejante dineral.

2.- Inclusivo. Desde hace tiempo se utiliza este concepto para designar a una democracia inclusiva: organización social que incluya la economía, naturaleza y política. Sería una democracia clásica junto con algunas socialistas, de nuevo cuyo, como: feminista, LGTB y verde. O sea, que tengan cabida todas las sensibilidades. Por contraposición con algo exclusivo, que es de un ámbito reducido para algo determinado.

3.- Deuda Perpetua. En el mundo hay una serie de países con una deuda en relación con el PIB de más del cien por cien. Esta deuda es impagable, en la práctica. Y encima estos países, no crean que hacen propósito de enmienda, sino que año tras año sigue aumentando su deuda. Pues hace poco, empezaron a sacar deuda a más de 50 años, hasta 100 años. Incluso se ha llegado a crear la nueva perpetua. Que sería aquella en la que el deudor solo paga intereses, manteniendo siempre la deuda. La deuda en si, supone que un país es esclavo de su prestamista. Puesto que nunca será libre, estará siempre supeditado a los antojos del prestamista. La deuda pública de España, supera el 120% del PIB, en datos oficiales. Siendo superior en datos reales. Algo menos de la mitad está en manos de no residentes. Con lo cual nos hace dependientes de estos acreedores..Y no vale la política infantil de la izquierda, de no reconocer cierta deuda con una mano y con la otra seguir pidiendo, para renovar deuda vencida más intereses y financiada el deficit del ejercicio en curso.

4.- Cambio climático. Esto se asocia con el calentamiento terrestre. Había que preguntarse qué calentamiento es ese, si este año hemos padecido “Filomena”. Y durante esos días se produjeron numerosas averías del suministro de agua, por roturas del frío en cañerías del agua corriente. Todos recordamos estampas más propias de Siberia, que de la España mediterránea. Desde otras épocas se sabe que en España, hay ciclos de agua y sequía. Como escritos, por ejemplo de la época de los romanos en la que ya había desbordamiento de ríos y regatos. Con estas teorías del cambio climático, calentamiento global las han hecho suyas la izquierda y han conseguido crear una serie de ONG, muy dependientes de las subvenciones públicas.

5.- Digitalización. O sea, la transformación de procesos analógico y objetos físicos en digitales. Después de repetir esta palabra los gobernantes, que nos desgobiernan. Resulta que viene la Pandemia del Covid-19. Y la gente se confina en sus domicilios. Vienen los Ertes y las consultas médicas telemáticas. Se pudo constatar que la administración pública no estuvo a la altura de las circunstancias. Quedando sin cobrar los Ertes, para bastante gente y no fueron unas semanas y, las gran dificultad para pedir cita médica para otras patologías distintas del Covid-19. A parte otros trámites con la administración que quedaron, sin una respuesta adecuada a las necesidades de los españoles que las demandaban. O sea, que piden digitalización para la sociedad y la propia administración no estuvo a la altura de las circunstancias.

6.- Sostenible. O sea políticas de satisfacer las necesidades actuales sin comprometer las futuras, ni el medio ambiente. Y combinando el crecimiento económico con la naturaleza y el entorno social. Aquí pondría el ejemplo de la supresión de la carne roja para 2050. Por que según el gobierno Social-comunista, no es sostenible el consumo de carnes rojas (vacuno, con una serie de meses y de caza -liebre, perdiz, ciervo-). Esto hace que se deje de cuidar, entre otros ecosistemas “La dehesa”, único en el mundo. Y que lo tenemos en la península ibérica. A parte que socialmente, va en contra de la España vacía. Despoblado más estos núcleos rurales por la falta de oportunidades de trabajo. Y encima llenado en contra de la tauromaquia y la caza. Tradiciones muy arraigadas. Y imponiendo lo que debemos comer y que no.

7.- Ideología de género. También se podría añadir las políticas LGTBIQ+. Con esta políticas se ha creado una ley de Violencia de género, en la cual, en la práctica un hombre es culpable mientras no se demuestro su inocencia. O sea, justamente al contrario que en democracia, que “todo el mundo (sin género) es inocente mientras no se demuestre lo contrario”. El hombre y la mujer, en vez de estar en igualdad de derechos y deberes; no. El hombre que “presuntamente” comete este delito de momento, es detenido y llevado a comisaría hasta que sea llevado a presencia del juez. Y si lo hace la mujer. O cualquier otro pareja del mismo sexo, esto no ocurre. Tampoco parece creíble el 0,0069% de falsas denuncias. También tenemos el tema de las políticas de LGTBIQ+. Existiendo todo un lobby alrededor de estas políticas, que son para una minoría. Un ejemplo: la diputación de Huesca, este año reservo plaza para una persona transexual. Cuando debería ser por su valía profesional, no por su orientación sexual. Para declarar transexual basta ir al registro civil e inscribirte con tu nuevo nombre. Cabe la picaresca española, de en vez de tener una competencia muy superior tenerla mucho menor si utiliza esta argucia y que nadie comprobará. Con todo estas iniciativas políticas se ha creado un Ministerio de igualdad. Al frente está la incomparable ministra, Irene Montero. Ministra por su “inmenso currículum”. Con unos presupuestos para este año de algo más de 450 millones de €. Que utilidad real tiene este ministerio?. Cuantos chiringuitos mantiene, de gente que no aporta nada, salvo su demagogia y hacer el ridículo con lo de: “todos, todas y todes”.

8.- Habría que añadir: el presunto adoctrinamiento educativo, en las aulas para esta políticas. Jugar a ser Dios: con el aborto y la Eutanasia. Puesto que tendría en su mano si naces o no y cuándo podría aplicarte la Eutanasia. Recuerdo que en el Canadá se le aplicó la Eutanasia a una mujer, porque manifestaba que se aburría, por el confinamiento durante la Pandemia por covid-19. La rescrituracion de la historia, con la ley de Memoria Histórica. Etc.

Por todo ello, el gobierno social-comunista: quiere decidir si nacemos o no, como debemos ser educados ( ya sabemos que: “los hijos no pertenecen a los padres”, según la Ministra Celaa), lo que debemos comer y qué no, cómo debe ser nuestro ocio y cuál mejor no, no debemos utilizar el avión menos de 2.5 horas, mejor tren, nos vacunarán los bolsillos por: el cambio climático, la igualdad, etc, se abrirán las fronteras, las de los inmigrantes (ahora migrantes), etc….hasta que nos muramos, teniendo el estado la potestad de aplicarte la Eutanasia llegado el caso. El gobierno Social-comunista en aplicación del nuevo catecismo de la España 2050 nos puede declarar herejes de la nueva doctrina “La inquisición Resiliente”. Resiliente: capacidad de afrontar la adversidad, sobreponiéndose a un estímulo adverso”, el gobierno Social-comunista, con el apoyo de los nacionalistas.

Teodoro del Valle